>>4178730,9
I don't believe in giving him attention, but there's no real other way to address this.
>>And no, don't try to pretend this is the work of a certain King of Faggotry. That's not his MO.
But that perfectly describes his MO. Everything he's ever done here has been a bid for attention. Everything. Talking about himself anonymously is a large part of that, which is why I generally try to avoid mentioning him at all; look at the recent mahjong threads if you want examples of how the guy behaves.
>As far as I'm concerned, anybody that brings up anything related to the topic at hand after this post is KoG/Jones/Bawson.
Yeah, I'm Jones. And I'm only bringing this up because, as far as I'm concerned, you are a humongous hypocrite and my "NO EXCEPTIONS" response mentality won't let you get away with it. (In other words, IHBT.)
Your "anti-Nameless Fairy agenda" of making metathread after metathread, essentially amounting to the force-feeding of trolls, is far less constructive than the couple imagedumps I did over the same period. What I'm trying to say is, if you're not a troll, you're a naive fool.
Hijacking threads you don't agree with is a childish way of lashing out at things you don't like. But making threads about it day in and day out, provoking posters like your aforementioned friend to redouble their efforts, is twice as childish. It's a tantrum without focus, that affects more than just one thread. And that's terrible.
I tried to resist this obvious troll, I really did. I ignored metathread after metathread, even when they deteriorated to Jonesy this Jonesy that. But in the end, on the archive, I was too weak. It's your win, bro.